Workflow and pilot planner
Map the current process, choose an AI role and prepare a bounded pilot charter.
Learn the method behind this tool →Examples are fictional planning inputs, not measured results. Switching the starting point replaces the fields below.
Prepare the weekly campaign review
A sourced review that helps the marketing lead choose one action to test.
Accountable human: Marketing lead
Current work
- Export campaign results
- Check dates and metric definitions
- Reconcile totals
- Write the performance summary
- Review claims and choose an action
Friction: Repeated copy-and-paste and unsupported explanations slow the review.
Proposed pilot
AI helps with a bounded draft or analysis. You choose the inputs, check the output and take the next action.
- Marketing lead confirms the useful outcome and the acceptance checks.
- Prepare only the authorized inputs, record their dates and definitions, and keep a copy of the current workflow for comparison.
- Give AI one bounded draft or analysis step. Keep the human in control of each next step.
- Check the artifact against the actual sources and the stated measure. Return corrections to the output's owner.
- The accountable human makes the review decision before any separately authorized external action.
- Compare the pilot with the baseline. Keep the useful steps, change what failed and save the corrected brief for another attempt.
- Success measure
- Time to a usable brief, factual corrections needed and whether the chosen action has supporting evidence.
- Baseline
- Not measured yet. Time one current review and count corrections before the pilot.
- Permitted actions
- Read the provided exports and write a draft in the pilot folder. Do not change campaigns, budgets or publish messages.
- Human review
- Marketing lead verifies claims, approves the final brief and decides any campaign changes.
Checks before repeating or scaling
- Confirm the outcome helps the person doing the work, not just that AI produced an answer.
- Record the baseline and pilot under comparable conditions. Include review time, corrections and relevant tool costs.
- Trace factual claims and numbers to the inputs. Reconcile counts, totals and definitions when data is involved.
- Try a missing or conflicting input. Check that the workflow reports the gap instead of inventing an answer.
- Inspect what changed, who reviewed it and which actions actually occurred.
- Choose to keep, revise or stop based on the evidence. Repeat successfully before scaling access or automation.
Read or select the export text
Save this as a draft for “Map the work people actually do.” Review it in the lesson before marking it complete.