Module 5 · Lesson 1 of 4

Review the output against evidence, not confidence

Inspect claims, calculations and behavior using the checks defined before the run.

Go to the exercise

What you will leave with

A review record with evidence, corrections and an acceptance decision.

Understand

The idea behind the work

Verification asks whether the output meets the task's actual checks. Read the source supporting a factual claim, reproduce a calculation or open the page and use its action. An assistant's summary of completed work is a useful navigation aid, but it is not the same as observing the result. Match the evidence to the claim being made.

Review factual correctness and practical usefulness separately. A faithful summary may still omit the decision the recipient needs. Record material corrections and unresolved questions rather than silently repairing the draft and declaring the original run successful. A reviewer can also make mistakes, so important findings should point to inspectable evidence.

Inspect a worked example

Synthetic example: inspect a decision memo

This is a fictional teaching example, not a client result or a claim about Joseph Carroll's past work.

This fictional memo summarizes the sample campaign calculation.

The starting input

The memo claims CPA is 20 and recommends moving spend; the source table shows spend 1,000 and conversions 40.

Work through it

  1. Recalculate CPA as 25 and record the numeric correction.
  2. Inspect whether goals or comparable periods support the proposed spending decision.
  3. Return the memo for revision because the recommendation lacks that evidence.

The result

A concrete review finding with a reproducible calculation and a missing-context question.

A mistake to recognize

Approving the memo because it is polished and includes a chart.

How to recover

Check material values and decision support before judging presentation.

Adapt the method

What changes in your business?

The same method can serve different settings. Data, allowed actions and operational support matter more than headcount alone.

Owner-led business or small team

Use a checklist and return to the original evidence, especially for plausible-looking numbers.

Department or growing team

Give the reviewer the source version and acceptance criteria, not just the finished draft.

Large or complex organization

Use the intended user's access and record review evidence according to the workflow's established responsibilities.

Try it, then inspect the result

Create a review record

Review an example output against three predefined checks. For each record pass, correction needed or unknown, with the exact evidence and next action.

Record review observations

Use a sample or a description you are allowed to share. Your answer stays in this browser when storage is available; export it to keep a separate copy. 0 / 6,000 characters.

Check your reasoning

The agent reports that a page works, but you have not opened the deployed URL. What can you claim?

Inspect your own output

Check each statement after you look at your answer. These evidence checks apply to this visit; your answer and completion status can be saved.

To mark completion, write an answer, check the reasoning scenario and inspect every evidence statement. You can continue to another lesson at any time.

Self-reported completion does not certify competence. Open My AI Plan to review your saved work.

Sources and further practice

The lesson is Carroll Consulting's teaching synthesis. These sources support the underlying capabilities and concepts; check the current product, plan and configuration before applying them.

You can move between lessons freely. Revisit the checks whenever your answer, evidence or business context changes.